Re: CHAT: a conlang of my very own :) (was: Re: unsubscribing)
| From: | Stephen DeGrace <stevedegrace@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Saturday, June 1, 2002, 5:22 |
|---|
--- In conlang@y..., Kendra <kendra@R...> wrote:
> > Hër Aë røët (not ðe Kænädëæn vauwel räzing :) )
søm
> > tekst in maë prsønæl orþagræfë... ðe coëßes øv
letrs
> > mäk no kläms tu inhärent supërëoritë øv enë sort
ænd
> > ar æ kambinäxøn "artistik" ventyur ænd øltimætlë
> > _orþogræfikæl_ (if ðæt emfæsis mäks senß - søm
> > dësizhøns an speling wr mäd an haëlë flipænt
> > kraëtërëæ...) reprëzentäxøn øv maë nätiv daëælekt,
ðe
> > most prfekt form øv Inglix ðæt hæz evr egzisted ;)
;).
> > I rot al maë prsønæl læb nots ðis wäy :).
> >
> > Aend hyr iz soem riten in dhe daygraefikael
vaariaent
> > oev dhe skript... :P
>
> A, p`i"uti`f'l :) Ha`u t`i`t` i"u ku`m tu mek þ`a`t
laik þ`a`t?
Aë rot it yuzing a progræm Aë rot kald HTMLpad, wic
wøz æktyuælë dëzaënd for kanvrting mäling list posts
intu kwik-ænd-drtë web päjes baë hænd, kanvrting enë
spexl käræktrs faund intu HTML eskäp sëkwenses. Its
fleksibl "kanvrzhøn täbl" yutilitë trns eot tu hæv æ
nømbr øv ønintended yußes æz wel, æmøng ðem, røëting
ðis skript yuzing tekst kods and kanvrting ðem in bæc
tu ðe këut spexl letrs :P.
Ðis iz egzæktlë ðe wäy Aë'd røët it baë hænd, eksept
ðæt eþ køms eot as æ d wiþ æ kraß þru it insted øv æ
normæl eþ in maë hændrøëting (alðo, æktyuæly, Aë
bäsiklë print evrëþing, no mæter wøt ðe skript, ðëz
däys, øðrwaëz it iz øndësøëføræbl, ænd nat in æ göd
wäy LEL :).
>tiri'n,
> u"i`t"x aim raitiq i`n, i`s` e fone`ti`k
re`pris`'ntexu`n u`f` þ`u` tiri'n
> skri`pt, p`oþ i`nf`e`nt'd p`ai mai fre`nt` t`"x`e`f.
Hi`lariu`sli, nu`n u`f`
> a`ur u`þ`'r fre`nt`s` ka`n d'saif'r i`t :)
Strangly enough, most people can't work out mine
either, unless I explain it. But there is a
significant minority of people who grasp it on sight,
some not people you'd expect, either, based on
interest in language, so it doesn't pay to rely on it
to much for disguise :P.
> Ai e`nt`"x`oi al þu` fu`nki kari`kt'rs` i`n þ`a`t.
Ai, tu, rait nots i`n
> sikri`t spe`liq, þ`o i`n þ`u a`kt"xu'l skri`pt, i`t
i`s` mu`t"x fa`st'r :)
Of course <g>.
> Something I don't like about other alphabets or
writing systems is thatI'm
> always looking for a 1-to-1 correspondance with
english, which somewhat
> limits my perspective, I think.
Could be... :)
Stephen
______________________________________________________________________
Find, Connect, Date! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Replies