Re: linguolabials (was: Re: Hell hath no Fury)
From: | Shreyas Sampat <nsampat@...> |
Date: | Thursday, June 14, 2001, 11:59 |
>I invented a freakfest of a conlang a few years back that included both a
>linguolabial trill and a linguolabial click. It had a full series of
trills
>and clicks/pops from the lips to the glottis. It used whistles for vowels.
>It also featured a "pro-verb" and forbade transitive verbs. Like I said --
>a freakfest.
A pro-verb? Like the following:?
He fell off the cliff.
He2 (proverb)-ed too.
where the proverb essentially acts like the English 'do', and absorbs
whatever arguments are overwritten, or like:
He ate pizza.
She (proverb)-ed gummybears.
where the proverb is just a verb?
In either case, what a brilliantly useful idea!
How miraculous! A hollow verb! (I'm being excitable. Pardon.)
On pro-forms:
What other pro-things are there? Pronouns, of course, are all over the
place. IMO this is possible because a noun tends to be used repeatedly in
a discourse, and so methods are devised to avoid that. On the other hand,
verbs are usually unrepeated for reasonable periods, and so when a proverb
is used it's going to be either in a poetic context or such that the
antecedent's been forgotten, or possibly in a me-too construction.
When a pro-device is used, how does one find the antecedent? Is it always
the nearest convenient thing, perhaps at the same level of clause nesting,
mm?
---
Shreyas
Replies