Re: Non-linear full-2d writing (again)

Sai Emrys wrote:
> On 1/25/06, Yahya Abdal-Aziz <yahya@...> wrote:
>
>>1.  Thanks for trying to explain your notion of "non-linear", and how it
>>differs from simply "not presented along a straight line".  If I might
>>summarise, I think your meaning of "non-linear" is what I would call
>>"non-sequential".  So we're really talking about basic internal structure
>>here, rather than (primarily) about representation.
>
> Two good tests are branching factor and recursivity. If it can't to
> both to arbitrary degrees, it's not what I'm talking about.
What do you mean by "arbitrary degree?"  If all symbols are the
same size you're more-or-less restricted to six branches from a
single symbol.

--
Jefferson
http://www.picotech.net/~jeff_wilson63/myths/