Re: Comparison of philosophical languages

On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 11:12:33AM -0800, Arthaey Angosii wrote:
> Emaelivpar HS Teoh, with snipping:
> >2) If you want to talk about the relative merits and flaws of auxlangs
> >   [...] The appropriate forum is AUXLANG.
> >
> >3) We are NOT interested in statements like "Ygyde is better than language
> >  X because ..." or "language X is superior/inferior to language Y
> >  because ...". We are NOT interested in presumptuous and imposing
> >  statements like "my way of building a language is better than yours", or
> >  "my way of creating words is more sensible than yours".
> >  This all belongs to AUXLANG.
>
> Ji'IYSH!*  If that's what goes on on AUXLANG, I'm never traveling to those
> war-infested realms!  ;)
[snip]

Well, I don't know if AUXLANG is as war-infested as what we've been
getting over the past few days, but it is seems to be a more appropriate
forum to post superiority/inferiority solicitations.

(See what you've done, now I've to apologize for marring AUXLANG's name.
:-P)


T

--
A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems. -- P. Erdos