Re: Comparison of philosophical languages
|Date:||Monday, January 20, 2003, 18:40|
On Monday 20 January 2003 4:54 pm, Padraic Brown wrote:
> --- Andrew Nowicki <andrew@...> wrote:
> > Sally Caves wrote:
> > Very interesting post! I agree that a rigid
> > taxonomical language does not make sense.
> Then why try to foist one on an unsuspecting
> world? Every post you've made about your auxlang
> has implied if not outright spelled out a
> taxonomical language. Look at the words you've
> given and their "translations". Every single one
> is an exercise in sorting and taxonomy.
> > Of all the languages that
> > I know Ygyde is the most promising because it
> OK. You've invoked Throckmorton's Law three times
> now. That's QUITE ENOUGH, thank you!
Throckmortons law? Could you elaborate on that one?