>Well, I cannot guarantee the correctness of the statistics. I don't however
>see
>any particular reason to disbelieve them. I might be able to find the New
True, but the burden of proof lies with those making the assertion. As to
statistics, I've lived long enough to know only too well that the outcome is
influenced not only by the diversity of the sampling but also the breadth of
the goal.
>Scientist article where I read about this if you're intrested.
Yes, please. Use my private email address if you wish.
> > **Ever notice how it always takes more than one straight man to beat up
> > a solitary gay man?
>
>Probably the result of a simple risk-benefit analysis.
Perhaps. Add to that the potential gross embarassment of the solo
pipe-wielding straight man if by chance the unarmed gay man defeated him.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus