Re: Have Had, Had Have
From: | Joe <joe@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 10:07 |
Philip Newton wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:44:51 +0100, Joe <joe@...> wrote:
>
>
>>Now, the construction 'I'd've had to have eaten' is perfectly
>>grammatical to me. It's the perfect of 'I would have to eat'. (In
>>French, 'j'aurais dû manger', German, 'ich hätte essen gemusst').
>>
>>
>
>That's not grammatical for this German speaker - I'd make it "ich
>hätte essen müssen", which I'd translate as "I should have eaten" or
>perhaps "I had to have eaten".
>
>
>
Okay, I wasn't actually sure of the past participle of 'müssen', you
see, so I looked it up, and my dictionary claimed it was 'gemusst'. Or
is the conditional perfect different from the normal one?
Reply