Re: Language "laws"?

Henrik Theiling scripsit:
> Hi!
>
> Yann Kiraly <yann_kiraly@...> writes:
> > Is it possible for a conlang to have k,t,d,g,b but no p? And can it lack
> > s,z,f,v,w and have th?
>
> It is all possible, because you invent it, anyway. :-) The question is
> whether it is realistic, and I'd say strictly no to the former and
> weakly no to the latter.
Egyptian colloquial Arabic fits the first description.

--
John Cowan                              <jcowan@...>
http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              http://www.reutershealth.com
                Charles li reis, nostre emperesdre magnes,
                Set anz totz pleinz ad ested in Espagnes.

Reply