Re: REQUEST: Engelang?
From: | David J. Peterson <dedalvs@...> |
Date: | Monday, May 30, 2005, 17:55 |
Tom wrote:
<<
Voksigid is another example of an engelang which claims not to be a
loglang and is clearly also not an artlang; but maybe it is an
auxlang. Is it one of those you already considered and rejected?
>>
Actually, yes, it is, because while it claims (right in its Langmaker
profile) that it *isn't* a loglang, it seems like it's pretty much just
trying to code formal semantics in a regular way, but which is
different from the other loglangs in exactly the same way that
formal semantics is different from logic.
Tom wrote:
<<
Rick Morneau's Machine Translation Interlingua is one.
>>
Actually, it looks like a pretty good one, but I already got one,
which I failed to think of right off the bat: AllNoun. I think this
one will be a bit more obvious to students who all know what
nouns and verbs are, but may not know what the issues behind
machine-readable text (and I wouldn't be the one to answer their
questions, I'm afraid). I wouldn't say that MT Interlingua is a
loglang, because it's goal isn't to encode logic. And I think when
I think of a loglang (to answer another question of yours), I
think of a language that's trying to encode logic in *some* way.
An engelang need not do so. In that way, I think that loglangs
would be a proper subset of engelangs, but I'll accept anyone
else's opinion on the matter if they've thought about it more.
-David
*******************************************************************
"A male love inevivi i'ala'i oku i ue pokulu'ume o heki a."
"No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn."
-Jim Morrison
http://dedalvs.free.fr/