Re: proto-romance questions
From: | Ed Heil <edheil@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 15, 1999, 2:30 |
nicole perrin wrote:
> J. Barefoot wrote:
> >
> > Well what'dy'a know? I went to the university library and they had
exactly
> > what I needed! "Proto-Romance Phonology" by Robert Hall, who my French
> > insists on calling Bob {cue creepy music}; it has lots of examples.
Perhaps
> > I'll post a proto-Romance vocabulary to my webpage. Anyway, not having
> > studied Latin really, I have some questions:
> > 1) the -ere verbs (so my sources say) were all stressed on the stem. Do
the
> > other verb classes have (semi-)regular stress like this? Specifically,
are
> > the -are verbs stressed on the ending? Because of stress and
> > diphthongization rules in my current sketch, the -ere (-ara) verbs
are
> > merging with the -are (-aira), by analogy of inflection, not infinitve
form.
> > Okay, so I have a question. Let me tell y'all what I've got so far.
{cough
> > *peer review?* cough}
I'll give you an overview of the kinds of Latin verbs, in the
infinitive and present tense. I'll capitalize the stressed syllable.
1st conjugation (long A stem):
Amo, Amas, Amat, aMAmus, aMAtis, Amant. aMAre.
2nd conjugation (long E stem):
HAbeo, HAbes, HAbet, haBEmus, haBEtis, HAbent. haBEre.
3rd conjugation (short e/i stem):
DUco, DUcis, DUcit, DUcimus, DUcitis, DUcunt. DUcere.
3rd conjugation with -io:
CApio, CApis, CApit, CApimus, CApitis, CApiunt. CApere.
4th conjugation (long I stem)
AUdio, AUdis, AUdit, auDImus, auDItis, AUdiunt. auDIre.
(That's from memory; I'm a little iffy on the 4th conjs but I think
it's right.)
Hope that helps!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
edheil@postmark.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------