Re: OT: Diacricital marks [Re: Question about "do"]
From: | John Cowan <jcowan@...> |
Date: | Monday, July 28, 2003, 20:06 |
Mark J. Reed scripsit:
> Speaking of which: am I correct in thinking that Italian only has
> the grave accent? I know French has both (plus circumflex); but I
> seem to recall that Italian has only the grave.
It's not so simple. Italian, like Catalan, mostly keeps to the "old
rules": the grave on low vowels, the acute on high ones. So a has
only the grave, i and u only the acute, and e and o can have either,
depending on whether they are [e] and [o] (acute) or [E] and [O] (grave).
However, it's very common nowadays to use the grave instead of the acute
on i and u. The only absolutely required accents in Italian are on
final stressed vowels and on certain monosyllables as a disambiguator
(as in Spanish). It's also common to use a sort of breve in handwriting.
French has the remnants of this system, except that it has u-grave in
the one word "ou`" to distinguish it from "ou".
--
"No, John. I want formats that are actually John Cowan
useful, rather than over-featured megaliths that http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
address all questions by piling on ridiculous http://www.reutershealth.com
internal links in forms which are hideously jcowan@reutershealth.com
over-complex." --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev
Replies