Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
From: | <li_sasxsek@...> |
Date: | Sunday, October 14, 2007, 2:17 |
> [mailto:CONLANG@listserv.brown.edu] On Behalf Of Amanda Babcock
Furrow
> At any rate, I remember being subscribed to paper versions of the
Vorlin
> newsletter and also one for lojban, and I have the impression
(possibly
> incorrect, or maybe true, especially given Conlang's birthdate)
that this
> was before I was on Conlang per se. Vorlin was the first one
that really
> felt like somebody else was messing around the same way I was
> - it was the
> first conlang I'd seen that was neither an auxlang (apologies
> if it was meant to be :) nor a published-fiction conlang.
Actually, Vorlin was designed as an IAL, though its creator has
since abandoned auxlangs, and therefore abandoned Vorlin. He has
left us a website (http://www.vorlin.org/) as a historical
reference, and there is still a dormant Yahoo group
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vorlin/). This was one of the few
auxlangs, I actually liked well enough to want to learn, but it just
wasn't developed enough, nor did it have any community to converse
with, so I ultimately began work on my own world auxlang Sasxsek, as
well as a number of other projects
(http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Dana_Nutter_Conlangs) which I
may or may not finish someday depending on how much time my other
interests take up.
------------------------------
deinx nxtxr / Dana Nutter
LI SASXSEK LATIS.
http://www.nutter.net/sasxsek