Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: Names of radiostations (was: Re: The young Tolkien)

From:John Cowan <cowan@...>
Date:Tuesday, July 17, 2001, 12:19
Muke Tever scripsit:
> From: "Padraic Brown" <pbrown@...> > > On Sun, 15 Jul 2001 bjm10@CORNELL.EDU wrote: > > > > >Callsigns are assigned by the FCC (part of the US > > >federal government) and are not handed out on the whim of the recipient. > > > > I doubt that WABC was arbitrarily assigned to the American > > Broadcasting Corporation's station in NYC. [...] > > Hehe. And UT Chattanooga has WUTC, and my school SAU, formerly SMC, has > WSMC. I don't know of any other local stations so transparently lettered, > though.
Indeed, the FCC will assign a station any four-letter sequence it wants (beginning with K or W), provided it is not assigned at the time. The rules kick in only if the station has no preference. I was wrong to state that originally the U.S. had only K and W was added later. The K/W distinction goes back to 1911, when the Bureau of Navigation was handing out three-letter codes for ship wireless stations: K was used for Atlantic ships and W (presumably "west") for Pacific ones. Nobody remembers why the distinction got flipflopped for land stations. KDKA Pittsburgh is not a survival of a universal K area. For several months in 1920-21, K prefixes were being given to all stations, for no known reason. A few other stations were licensed with KD prefixes at that time, but later died. (At that time, KA-KC belonged to Germany, not the U.S.) These and many other details at http://www.ipass.net/~whitetho/recap.htm . -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter