Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Plan B phonology (was Re: Another weird idea!)

From:R A Brown <ray@...>
Date:Tuesday, September 13, 2005, 7:47
Jörg Rhiemeier wrote:

>Hallo! > >R A Brown wrote: > >
[snip]
>>Exactly so. And the fact that we have |f| = fOUGHt or Fought, but no >>example of just plain 'short o' in the inventory, leads me to think it >>is patently Merkan English :) >> >> > >Yes. Shows just how phonologically naïve the whole thing is. > >
I agree.
>But there are some neat ideas in it, e. g. applying Huffman coding >to morphemes such that one can always tell how long the morpheme is >by looking at its initial phonemes. >
Oh yes, it is certainly an interesting article with some neat ideas. Anyone contemplating a loglang should IMO read it.
> But the mapping of phonemes to phones stinks - >
Yes, it is fairly obvious that Jeff was not interested in that aspect - he just gave a somewhat rushed (IMO) & fairly naive way of giving phonetic values to his strings of written consonants.
>but then, it is not really our business to >complain (see the "Campaign for rational Klingon romanisation" >thread). It is much more of our business to do better. > >
Indeed so. I am working on it - but 'real life' keeps getting in the way :-) [snip]
>>Exactly the same thought occurred to me yesterday! I began playing >>around with a system whereby the epenthetic vowel was generated by the >>least significant bit of the first consonant & the most significant bit >>of the second one. Umm - think I'll work on that one :-) >> >> > >That's an interesting idea! > >
Thanks - I must try to formalize this idea, =====================================
>>I recall that Srikanth used numeric digits with dual pronunciations in >>his Lin; but while, if they occurred between consonants they were all >>pure vowels (no diphthongs as there are apparently with Plan B), when >>they occur next to a vowel they are not consonants - as in Plan B & >>Max's 'weird idea') - but determine both the length and the tone of the >>adjacent vowel. Weird :) >> >> > >Aren't the phonetic values of Lin symbols a secondary representation >of a telephathic language? > >
Yes, picked up, as i said, by a family living in the Chambal valley of central India. On further investigation, I find that the Lynu, the 'speakers' of Lin, inhabit a planet in the Solar system Gleipskandhu in the galaxy NGC0888, 101 000 light years far from from our own Milky Way. See: http://www.iiap.res.in/personnel/srik/conkind.html But I discover also that in version 5.03 of Lin, Srikanth has abandoned the dual pronunciation of the non-alphabetic characters ("cements") - they now each have a single, invariable sound; see: http://www.iiap.res.in/personnel/srik/phono.html (I must update the links on my website) -- Ray ================================== ray@carolandray.plus.com http://wwww.carolandray.plus.com ================================== MAKE POVERTY HISTORY

Reply

Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...>