Re: Rubaga Phones
From: | Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...> |
Date: | Sunday, March 17, 2002, 13:53 |
Thanks, Christophe, I knew I could count on you! There's a little bit of
discussion below.
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 03:23:30 +0100, Christophe Grandsire
<christophe.grandsire@...> wrote:
>En réponse à Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...>:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I have some tables of phonetic symbols ((I hope the columns line up))
>> I'm using for my Rubaga description and am wondering if anyone would
>> care to provide X-SAMPA equivalents.
>
>X-SAMPA equivalents? No problem! The ones I don't give equivalents to are
>identical in X-SAMPA to what you gave. And I hope it will still be lining
>up with me :)) .
They line up. I've redone the tables with most of the substitutions.
Consonants:
| stop fricative nasal trill later. aprx.
| VL Vd VL Vd Vd VL Vd Vd Vd
----------------+---------------------------------------------
bilabial | p b p\_w m
labiodental | f v
labiodent.+pal. | f_j v_j
apicodental | t d T D n l
apicodent.+lab. | T_w D_w
alveolar | s z (r)
retroflex | r'
palatoalveolar | S Z
palatovelar or
palatal | c J\ C j\ J L j
velar | k g x G N
labiovelar | k_w g_w x_w G_w N_w L\_w w
uvular | R\_0 R\
glottal | h
labioglottal | h_w
>/w/ is normally a labiovelar approximant. You're sure that what you mean
>is purely bilabial? (I ask that because you also have a labiovelar row,
>where /w/ would fit better)
Well, the tongue is lowered somewhat in my own pronunciation of /w/, but it
could be labiovelar, if that's more frequent.
>Quite simple. Your W is X-SAMPA _w, and your J is X-SAMPA _j :)) .
>
>There's nothing like a retroflex trill in IPA (and I can't see how to mark
>it). I replaced it here by the tap.
Are you sure? Isn't the Irish /r/ usually a retroflex trill?
>I rendered your voiceless uvular trill with the voiced one and the sign
>for voicelessness.
I'd forgotten to include symbols for uvular fricatives, since non-trilled
versions can occur in dialects.
>> Also, what's the proper form of the affricates [tS] and [dZ] (the t
>> and d in these are alveolar).
>
>[t_S] and [d_Z] (_ renders the tie bar, but is also used for diacritics in
>X-SAMPA).
>
Vowels:
| unrounded rounded
| front central back
----------+---------------------------
close | i u
close lax | I U
close mid | e o
mid | @
???????? | E 6 O
open | a_"
>[I] and [U] are not close-mid (that's [e] and [o]), they are close lax.
>The only mid vowel is the schwa [@]. Also, [a] is not really central but
>front (unless you mean [6], which is near open central unrounded, or
>inverted a in IPA.
I was using relative terminology, since the vowels don't exactly match.
I had in mind /I/, /U/, /e/, /o/, /E/, /O/ all being slightly lowered and
relatively tense, but I guess I'll have to change it, if it can't be
notated.
> You can also centralise [a], but then you have to use
>the centralise diacritic - the umlaut - which makes in X-SAMPA [a_"]) and
>[V], if you mean the vowel in "but" (inverted v in IPA) is the unrounded
>equivalent of [O].
My own vowel in "but" is central.
>Apart from that, you're using X-SAMPA for the vowels already :)) .
>
>Christophe.
>
>
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
>
>Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.
Why do I always get the Lon Chaney roles?
Jeff J.
Replies