Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Rubaga Phones

From:Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...>
Date:Sunday, March 17, 2002, 13:53
Thanks, Christophe, I knew I could count on you! There's a little bit of
discussion below.

On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 03:23:30 +0100, Christophe Grandsire
<christophe.grandsire@...> wrote:

>En réponse à Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...>: > >> Hi all, >> I have some tables of phonetic symbols ((I hope the columns line up)) >> I'm using for my Rubaga description and am wondering if anyone would >> care to provide X-SAMPA equivalents. > >X-SAMPA equivalents? No problem! The ones I don't give equivalents to are >identical in X-SAMPA to what you gave. And I hope it will still be lining >up with me :)) .
They line up. I've redone the tables with most of the substitutions. Consonants: | stop fricative nasal trill later. aprx. | VL Vd VL Vd Vd VL Vd Vd Vd ----------------+--------------------------------------------- bilabial | p b p\_w m labiodental | f v labiodent.+pal. | f_j v_j apicodental | t d T D n l apicodent.+lab. | T_w D_w alveolar | s z (r) retroflex | r' palatoalveolar | S Z palatovelar or palatal | c J\ C j\ J L j velar | k g x G N labiovelar | k_w g_w x_w G_w N_w L\_w w uvular | R\_0 R\ glottal | h labioglottal | h_w
>/w/ is normally a labiovelar approximant. You're sure that what you mean >is purely bilabial? (I ask that because you also have a labiovelar row, >where /w/ would fit better)
Well, the tongue is lowered somewhat in my own pronunciation of /w/, but it could be labiovelar, if that's more frequent.
>Quite simple. Your W is X-SAMPA _w, and your J is X-SAMPA _j :)) . > >There's nothing like a retroflex trill in IPA (and I can't see how to mark >it). I replaced it here by the tap.
Are you sure? Isn't the Irish /r/ usually a retroflex trill?
>I rendered your voiceless uvular trill with the voiced one and the sign >for voicelessness.
I'd forgotten to include symbols for uvular fricatives, since non-trilled versions can occur in dialects.
>> Also, what's the proper form of the affricates [tS] and [dZ] (the t >> and d in these are alveolar). > >[t_S] and [d_Z] (_ renders the tie bar, but is also used for diacritics in >X-SAMPA). >
Vowels: | unrounded rounded | front central back ----------+--------------------------- close | i u close lax | I U close mid | e o mid | @ ???????? | E 6 O open | a_"
>[I] and [U] are not close-mid (that's [e] and [o]), they are close lax. >The only mid vowel is the schwa [@]. Also, [a] is not really central but >front (unless you mean [6], which is near open central unrounded, or >inverted a in IPA.
I was using relative terminology, since the vowels don't exactly match. I had in mind /I/, /U/, /e/, /o/, /E/, /O/ all being slightly lowered and relatively tense, but I guess I'll have to change it, if it can't be notated.
> You can also centralise [a], but then you have to use >the centralise diacritic - the umlaut - which makes in X-SAMPA [a_"]) and >[V], if you mean the vowel in "but" (inverted v in IPA) is the unrounded >equivalent of [O].
My own vowel in "but" is central.
>Apart from that, you're using X-SAMPA for the vowels already :)) . > >Christophe. > >http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr > >Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.
Why do I always get the Lon Chaney roles? Jeff J.

Replies

Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Stephen Mulraney <ataltanie@...>