Re: LeGuin was Re: Introduction
From: | Padraic Brown <elemtilas@...> |
Date: | Saturday, January 11, 2003, 18:58 |
--- Sally Caves <scaves@...> wrote:
Yri dalvent remelfbyefla rypperam - fyrikkômrem
deshry! It seems I got it all wrong. Well, the
old saw is a true saw: "En dawes pensa ante
pharlar - au devordreus.ty la ntengete!" [Think
twice before speaking, or you'd rather bite your
tongue off!]
Padraic.
> Ooh, gods! may you singular be smacked with a
> farlarop for what you just
> did! <G> Shame on you, Padraic! You took a
> continuous piece of my original
> post and you inserted Amanda's response to it,
> and then made the rest of my
> original post look like a reply to her. I was
> educated by Amanda's
> information, and modified my views. But here
> you make it look as though I
> persisted in being unconvinced that Le Guin is
> a conlanger.
=====
Percumion farfer, ec nasteros em purfelos, polim ed siramet.
-Pomperios Perfurios.
.
Reply