Re: my grammar

Tomas R. Wier wrote:

>#1 wrote:
> >                                   Nominative  Accusative
> >
> > Singular first person         pi              bi
> > Singular second person        te              de
> > Singular third person         ka              ga
> >
> > Plural   first person         pI              bI
> > Plural   second person        tE              dE
> > Plural   third person         ka~             ga~
>
>You know, although this is unusual, I think one could rather
>straightforwardly account for such a pattern by a few simple
>diachronic sound changes.  The voicing of the accusative could
>result from some prefixed vowel (perhaps schwa) which later gets
>deleted.  Likewise, the vowel quality in the plurals could be
>accounted for by some sort of nasal suffix, perhaps /n/, which
>also gets deleted.  This would require one more change, however,
>to collapse all nasalized high or mid vowels together with their
>nonnasalized counterparts.
You think a such regular thing could be evolved from an irregular one?

It would be a good idea, I create a very regular language that would have
spontaneously evolved from a simpler irregular language (that I may create
after)

Usually, as much I think, a natural evolution probably lead to a more
irregular language

It would interresting and I can create all a conculture with this in wich a
people, with their evolution tend naturally to simplify their language or
the language could be itself auto-simplifier

Following the Sapir-Worf hypothesis it may have an effect on them and it
would make them completely different

Thanks