Re: A Conlang, created by the group?

On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Nik Taylor wrote:

> Here's a suggestion: someone could come up with the rudimentary form of
> a conlang (phonology, basic morphology, including any inflections, some
> basic grammar), and "put it up for adoption", so to speak.  It would be
> interesting to see how different people would flesh out this skeleton
> language.
>
        Kind of like a round-robin conlang?  That's a neat idea, actually.
One person could come up with the phonology, another the morphology,
others lexicon and so forth.  Heh . . . yes, I agree, this would be rather
interesting.  Easy to do via e-mail too.  Anyone want to try out this
idea?

--
Adam Parrish                   "A friend of mine once told me that the
myth@inquo.net                 best way to understand teenagers was to
http://www.inquo.net/~myth/    think of them as constantly on LSD.  It was
                               good advice." -- Mary Pipher