Re: A Conlang, created by the group?

On Fri, 9 Oct 1998 09:51:04 -0500, Carlos Thompson
<cthompso@...> wrote:

>What about genders and subgenders?
> Animate
>   Person (any thing able to speak, wath ever speak would mean)
>     Human being
>     Deity
>     Corporation
>     Alien
>   Animal
>     Domestic compaining animal
>     Cattle
>     Wild animal
>     Insect and other small animals
>     Microscopic animals
>   Weather and natural phenomena
> Inanimate
>   Living inanimate things
>     Parts of animate beings
>     Plants
>   Tangible non-living things
>   Intangible things
>
>Any body has make experiment with subgenders?
>
>-- Carlos Th
I think it would be too much trouble to remember so many genders. =
Besides,
agreeing on a classification scheme would be problematic. I think a
relatively small number (like "red/green/blue") would be preferable.