Re: OT: Conorthography aesthetics (WAS: Re: Featural code based on ...
| From: | Ray Brown <ray.brown@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Saturday, September 13, 2003, 13:01 |
|---|
On Friday, September 12, 2003, at 07:02 , H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 06:28:01AM +0100, Ray Brown wrote:
> [snip]
>> In fact, H.S Teoh, but I don't find the example of Eisedian at all ugly.
>> in fact, I like it - I find it attractive.
> [snip]
>
> Well, *I* think Ebisedian's ASCII transcription is really ugly.
Ugliness, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.
> I use it
> only because of the limitations of ASCII;
With that I entirely sympathasize. The sooner ASCII is asigned to the
dustbin of history the better, I day. Vivat Unicode!
> the LaTeX orthography looks
> *much* better. Now, if I'd only get off my lazy butt and build that long
> planned font for _sanoki'_, the writing system of Ebisedian...
Please do! If I actually like Ebisedians ASCII transcription, I'm dying
to see the actual sanoki writing system.
Ray
===============================================
ray.brown@freeuk.com (home)
raymond.brown@kingston-college.ac.uk (work)
http://home.freeuk.com/ray.brown
===============================================
Replies