Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Cases, again

From:Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...>
Date:Thursday, March 18, 2004, 6:25
Garth Wallace wrote:
> Japanese uses nouns for more specific directions than just "to" and > "from". The Japanese equivalent of "into the box" translates more > literally as "to the inside of the box".
Of course, forms like _naka ni_ (which should more accurately probably be written _nakani_ or _naka-ni_; "no", "ni", "e", "wa", "ga" and "o" are really more like suffixes than the traditional analysis of postpositions/particles) could be interpreted as postpositions governing the genitive. Michael Martin wrote:
> > OK, first of all, thank you to everyone who answered. > > If I understand correctly, the basic answer to my question of what case > to use is: it's up to me to make the rule. And, yes, my intention for > my conlang is to have prepositions, but it never occurred to me that > the exact meaning of the preposition could be dependent upon the case > of the noun it is being used with. That's something I'll have to give > some thought to. > > Now, along the same lines, in a sentence like, "I went to the man's > house" my assumption would be that "man" is in the genitive and "house" > is in the dative case. Is that correct? Now what about, "we heard the > man's voice"? Would the same pattern hold? "Man" in genitive, "voice" > in dative?
In most languages, yes. But, you might want to consider the alternative, used in some languages: A special case indicating that a noun is possessed by something else. Thus, you'd have "I went house-possessed man-dative", "I heard voice-possessed man-dative", "I bought book-possessed man-acc" ("I bought the man's book"), etc. (Of course, in these examples, the case could be different, the point I'm making is just which noun is marked) Mark Reed wrote:
> > Now what about, "we heard the > > man's voice"? Would the same pattern hold? "Man" in genitive, "voice" > > in dative? > > No, "voice" would be in the accusative case, because it is the object of > the verb. > > The above assumes we're talking about an accusative language, of course, > and not ergative, etc.
Depends on the language. In some languages, "voice" would be marked with a case other than accusative. In Japanese, for example, "we" would be marked as dative, and "voice" as nominative.