Re: CHAT: The [+foreign] attribute
From: | Herman Miller <hmiller@...> |
Date: | Friday, September 6, 2002, 15:00 |
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 18:03:56 +0000, Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...>
wrote:
>Herman Miller wrote:
>>Names of countries [in Tirehlat] often end in -vor, and
>>the corresponding languages in -lhat: ingglavor "England", ingglalhat
>>"English language"; frangsevor "France", frangselhat "French language";
>>svenskavor "Sweden", svenskalhat "Swedish language".
>
>Any specific reason that _svenskavor_ is based on the ethnonyme/language
>name rather than on the country name?
In this particular case it's arbitrary whether "svenska-" or "sverje-"
would turn out to be the basic root. There's a general trend to use
language names instead of country names; other examples are "mylaaju-"
(from "Melayu") for both Malaysia and the Malay language, and "malgaash-"
for the Malagasy language and the name of Madagascar. In other cases, the
country name is borrowed. Greenland and the Greenlandic language get their
name kalaalhit- from "Kalaallit Nunaat". Names of countries ending in -stan
are generally borrowed by substituting -vor for -stan (afhaanvor, pakyvor,
kazahvor, and so on). But Tirelat is far from systematic, and in most cases
the choice of names is arbitrary. The Tirelat root for China/Chinese
doesn't come from "Han", or "Zhongguo", or anything comparable, but from
the Russian "kitai".
--
languages of Azir------> ---<http://www.io.com/~hmiller/lang/index.html>---
hmiller (Herman Miller) "If all Printers were determin'd not to print any
@io.com email password: thing till they were sure it would offend no body,
\ "Subject: teamouse" / there would be very little printed." -Ben Franklin