Re: Future Spanish
From: | FFlores <fflores@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, August 17, 1999, 16:23 |
Eric Christopherson <raccoon@...> wrote:
>=20
> Pablo, your idea for a future Spanish conlang sounds neat. Are you
> Andalusian, by chance? ;)
I'm an Argentinian. Going up my tree, there's probably a half=20
of Italian blood (mostly Sicilian, which is evident if you live
one day with my mother) and a half of Spanish blood, which may
or may not have been Andalusian.
Oh, yes, I'm now seeing it in my table (Don Blaheta's compilation).
Its ASCII renderings are all almost equally hideous. But M\ looks
better than j<vel>. I think I'll use /3/ in my own home-made scheme.
In orthography it will be just a final <g>, for example:
Sp. _enemigo_, FutSp. _enimig_ /en^Imi3/
> > What can I do with a labialized alveolar flap /r_w/?
> > Does that even exist or am I making it up? I intend it
> > to derive from [Br].
>=20
> <<<
> Not sure about this.
> >>>
I've heard that <wr> in Old or Middle English represented this
sound, though it later merged with /r/. That's my only clue,
and I'm not confident about the source. But I can make the
sound -- what I don't know is whether it *is* a single sound,
or a coarticulation.
> <<<
> It sounds like the /h/ is carried over from the /h/ < /s/ in /boh/ < vo=
s. In
> the terminology of Brithenig, this would be a spirant mutation (of cour=
se in
> Brithenig tem=E9s would become them=E9s).
> >>>
Yes, I'll call it 'spirant protesis' or something of the sort (it
sounds cultured, doesn't it? :). No spirant mutation. There will
however be a nasal mutation after the article _un_. And I'm having
trouble resisting to the idea of also having vowel harmony=20
(properly speaking it would be... fronting assimilation?) by=20
which /us'tedes/ would be pronounced [yh't_jej\Ih]).
--Pablo Flores