Re: LWII: Euroclones reloaded (fi: Attack of the Euroclones)
From: | Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@...> |
Date: | Thursday, June 12, 2003, 7:24 |
--- Jeffrey Henning skrzypszy:
> I've followed this thread with interest. In retrospect, I think
> Euroclone is too pejorative a label, and I will change all languages in
> the database that are marked Euroclone with IAL instead.
A wise decision! However, for some of the languages listed currently as
euroclones this won't work. I mean, Ignota, Nadsat IALs?
Ignota IMO could be one of the following three: superset (because it is a set
word words embedded in Latin), personal, stealth. Oh, wait, I see that it is a
stealth language now! Did you do that today, or have I been wrong all the time?
Nadsat is most definitely a superset language.
I haven't seen all languages on Langmaker.com, not even all the Euroclones, but
I think the following languages can be safely added to the fictional or
fictional diachronic languages category:
Aercant, Aingeljã, Brandonian, Cuërna, Daisilingo, Deviasew, Dosian, Omnesian,
Romantica.
"Chicken" seems more like a case for "Miscellaneous".
> Model-language profiles already have a space to list all language
> inspirations. At some point I want to divide this into two fields, one
> of which will be a comma-delimited list of languages. Then I could
> create index pages that show all the languages that were inspired by
> Japanese or Bulgarian or Quenya, for instance. (The other field would
> be a free form description: "Fubarish is essentially French without
> nasalization and with regular spelling.")
Good idea!
(I like Fubarish already! ;) )
Jan
=====
"Originality is the art of concealing your source." - Franklin P. Jones
__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html
Replies