Re: Uusisuom language (Online lesson)
From: | Raymond Brown <ray.brown@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 5:33 |
At 6:58 pm +0100 27/3/01, Daniel44 wrote:
>Uusisuom is a new, auxiliary language designed for international usage. Its
>main influences have been Finnish, Lithuanian and Russian.
While it is certainly refreshing to meet an IAL that is not 'yet another
Euroclone', I'm hard put to work out why a language designed for
international use has these three languages as its main influence.
Is there any influence from distinctly non-European languages?
>It is a beautiful
>language and surprisingly simple to learn and use.
'twas said of Esperanto more than a century ago; and, I believe, some
Glosa-pe say the same of their favored international language.
[snip]
>
>NOTE:
>
>'-kat' in Uusisuom is the same as <'s> in English. To say 'a bowl OF water',
>you write 'the water's bowl' = vettakat huppo
...which, of course, does not mean 'a bowl of water'.
>A bowl of milk = latkat huppo
I'm a little surprised that possession and the partitive are expressed the
same way - many languages do express the two relationships differently.
[snip]
>Verb: to have = talti
>
>I have - talan
>You have - talet
>He/she/it has - talollu
>We have - talamme
>You have (polite) - talatte
>They have - talanne
I don't recall seeing personal endings for verbs in an IAL since Volapük.
Are these endings, like the Volapük ones, merely suffixed pronouns or does
Uusisuom actually have inflexions (not IMO a winner in an international
language)?
[snip]
>
>11 - yhtilukan
>12 - suukilukan
>13 - vassilukan
>14 - jorkalukan
>15 - lahvolukan
>16 - kuutalukan
>17 - loudinlukan
>18 - kovilukan
>19 - vollilukan
>
>20 - suukiluka
>30 - vassiluka
>40 - jorkaluka
>50 - lahvoluka
>60 - kuutaluka
>70 - loudinluka
>80 - koviluka
>90 - volliluka
>100 - sani
Sorry to say it, but you are surely saddling UUsisuom with the same
potentiality for misunderstanding as English by giving it such similar
words for N+10 and Nx10. If I had a pound for every time I'd heard
questions like "Did you say thirTEEN or thirTY?" "Was that fourTEEN or
forTY?", I'd be quite a rich guy by now. IMNSHO _vassilukan_, e.g. is far
too similar to _vassiluka_ for comfort.
=========================================
A mind which thinks at its own expense
will always interfere with language.
[J.G. Hamann 1760]
=========================================
Replies