Re: Accusative, Dative, ?
From: | Danny Wier <dawier@...> |
Date: | Thursday, May 27, 1999, 0:14 |
Okay, sorry for the late reply. My brain has an 8086 in it.
Khathba Joshua Shinavier:
>Well, Arov=EBn allows up to three such patients for any given
>semantic word, all of which may be used as verbs, or as nouns, etc.
>"Jurative", otherwise known simply as "3rd object" is just slot number=20
>three
>in this system, and is not used often. Take for instance the word "v=EB=
g",
>which indicates a schematic drawing, a map or a plan:
> Subject: the (physical) map
> Object 1: the thing being mapped (for instance, a city)
> Object 2: the focal point of the map -- what it is which the map is
> meant to pick out and display (for instance, the streets of=
=20
>the
> city)
> Object 3: purpose of the map
I just remembered, I got that for Tech. Verbs, of course, are conjugated=
=20
according to the person, number and gender of the subject, but infixes=20
within the verb indicate the person, number and gender of the direct obje=
ct,=20
the indirect object, and what could be considered a "third object". This=
is=20
an adverbian pronoun affix, which can have a number of meanings but usual=
ly=20
indicates a locative, since that's what case it is technically. But it a=
lso=20
can have a meaning of instrumental or ablative. All this info is=20
incorporated into the verb complex, as Tech is both inflecting and=20
polysynthetic.
Joshua's "jurative" sounds more like an instrumental to me. I like that=20
idea anyhow.
Danny
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com