Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
From: | Andreas Johansson <and_yo@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 6:09 |
Jesse Bangs wrote:
>
>Christian Thalmann sikyal:
>
> > --- In conlang@y..., Kala Tunu <kalatunu@H...> wrote:
> >
> > > aherm, maybe we shouldn't flame each other for such trivia.
> >
> > How come everybody who says that in this thread then immediately
> > proceeds to flame someone for such trivia? =P
>
>Hence my silence on this thread, despite the fact that I started it, and
>that I'm still convinved that Christophe is utterly wrong.
>
>Feh. In my own conlangs I will continue to use |ei| for [e], and continue
>to think it correct.
Well, nobody's argued it wrong; merely that it's not found among natlangs
(who use the Latin alphabet), and that it's not very intuitive (a subjective
claim, of course).
Andreas
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.