Re: Chinese Dialect Question
| From: | Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, October 15, 2003, 17:49 |
|---|
On 14 Oct 2003 at 13:46, Benct Philip Jonsson wrote:
> At 00:48 7.10.2003, Paul Bennett wrote:
>
> >Hindi (or more properly Devanagari) has /r/, /r`/ and /r`_h/ The latter
> >are written with
> >diacritised versions of /d/ and /d_h/ (notably not /d`/ and /d`_h/). Also,
> >there's the
> >syllabic rhotics /r\=/ and /r\=:/
>
> That's certainly wrong. {r`} is dotted {d`} and {r`_h} is
> dotted {d`_h}.
Yes. I don't know what happened, since the correct glyphs are used in
my source, and the underdots in the romanisation are completely clear
and visible. Probably just a brain-fart.
Paul