From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Thursday, October 2, 2003, 19:44 |
En réponse à Mark J. Reed :>Right. Allow me to expand upon James' statement. "An >*otherwise-sane* conlang that differentiated between 3+ Rs would be kinda >cool." > >:)Which raises a question: can you have a conlang which distinguishes 3 or more rhotics and still call it sane? ;))))) Christophe Grandsire. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.
Herman Miller <hmiller@...> |