Re: A prioi vs. A posteriori ?
| From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Monday, February 3, 2003, 23:17 |
|---|
Christophe Grandsire wrote at 2003-02-03 23:16:50 (+0100)
> En réponse à James Landau <Neurotico@...>:
> > You mean, with the M at the beginning . . . and then the velar
> > plosive? I can see that.
> >
>
> That's all there can be since Maggel's word for "tree" is |driuoj|
> ['dryZ]. By the way, coming back to the original subject of the
> thread, this word is inspired in some way by some natlang word
> having a relationship with woods. Who will guess what I'm talking
> about? ;)))))
>
English "tree"? It's not that far off... but then, as the word means
tree, you probably wouldn't have said "having a relationship with
woods". But I don't want to avoid the obvious.
Replies