Re: Committed: (was Printed Conlang stuff?)
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Thursday, January 11, 2001, 0:08 |
En réponse à Barry Garcia <Barry_Garcia@...>:
>
> Montreiano is actually probably the most stable of my conlangs. Reason
> being, because I want it to be a fairly realistic looking Romance Lang,
> i
> really cant do much innovation by way of grammar. However, vocabulary
> wise, I can add in words from different languages to make it different
> (such as the various Rumsien words i wrote down so I can incorporate
> them
> in). So, i could probably commit that one to print. But, Saalangal on
> the
> other hand changes from time to time, so i'm a bit wary of committing
> that
> to print (although it seems to be stabilizing out).
>
Strangely enough, all my conlangs are extremely stable. For some of them (like
O and Narbonósc), what I showed on the list was in fact a second version (in
fact, since between the first and second versions there was a gap of a few
years, I could even say that O and Narbonósc are in fact new projects based on
older ones), but I don't go further than that. I nearly never change my
conlangs' features once I put them in. That must be why I have so many ongoing
projects: each time I become dissatisfied with some features of a conlang I'm
working on, or I discover new features that I want to experiment, I end up
creating a new conlang, as I don't modify my previous ones :) .
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr