Re: Ok, here we go

En réponse à Barry Garcia <barry_garcia@...>:

>
> So there you go. Saalangal is something i should work on more, since
> it's
> all my invention and not mostly done as with Montreiano.
>
> http://home.csumb.edu/g/garciabarry/world/saalangal1.pdf
>
Well, it all looks good so far (but I long to see the verbal forms ;)) ). I've
seen a few typos (and a small typography glitch, check the suffixes' list, the
line of -agpain is in a smaller fontsize than the rest of the text), so if you
want me to point them at you just tell me ;)) . I've only seen two problems in
the document:
- You present the plain style of Kuraw as Santul, but refer to it as wasantul.
Now I saw that in Saalangal "wa-" is an optional abstract marker, but maybe you
shouldn't put it at all when you refer to those words in an English text.
Referring to the plain style as "Santul" looks better to me ;)) .
- You've not explained *where* inside the root the infix -ng- appears.

That's all I've seen so far. The rest looks good to me. Anyway, trigger
languages are a personal favourite of mine, so please present more ASAP!! ;))))

Christophe.

http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr

Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.