Marcus Smith wrote:
>
>Here's a few more.
(The run-down for Kash is given in CAPS:)
>-- case is less common, and when present, usually doesn't not follow an
>ergative pattern. CASE YES, ERG. NO
>-- often have definite articles (OV languages tend not to). ONE, OF LIMITED
USE
>-- demonstratives, numerals, and adjectives follow the noun in that order
or
>the opposite order (adj, num, dem) LATTER YES, BUT NUMERALS PRECEDE
>-- often have relative pronouns AN INVARIANT RELATIVE MARKER
>-- conjunctions is of the form "X and X" rather than "and X and X" or "X
and X
>and", the former is rare, the later is (possibly) unattested. YES
>-- prefixes are common for tense, case, etc. There are always some
suffixes
>though. BOTH
>-- Subordinate clauses are often finite (e.g., "I want he goes" rather than
"I
>want him to go"). YES
>
Well well. That makes Kash just about a perfect SVO language. It answers
yes to all of czHANg's original post, as well as most of the above, as
noted.