Re: Latin /j/ etc. (was: Latin <h>)
From: | Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Friday, January 16, 2004, 21:23 |
At 07:42 15.1.2004, Ray Brown wrote:
>What do you think of the hypothesis that the spelling
>MAGIS represented /majjis/ even in classical times?
>
>Not much :)
Too bad, since Slevanic (_Slvaniec_) _maj_ would
require that derivation! I guess i shall have to
change it to _mazs_ [maZ].
/BP 8^)
--
B.Philip Jonsson mailto:melrochX@melroch.se (delete X)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__
A h-ammen ledin i phith! \ \
__ ____ ____ _____________ ____ __ __ __ / /
\ \/___ \\__ \ /___ _____/\ \\__ \\ \ \ \\ \ / /
/ / / / / \ / /Melroch\ \_/ // / / // / / /
/ /___/ /_ / /\ \ / /'Aestan ~\_ // /__/ // /__/ /
/_________//_/ \_\/ /Eowine __ / / \___/\_\\___/\_\
Gwaedhvenn Angeliniel\ \______/ /a/ /_h-adar Merthol naun
~~~~~~~~~Kuinondil~~~\________/~~\__/~~~Noolendur~~~~~~
|| Lenda lenda pellalenda pellatellenda kuivie aiya! ||
"A coincidence, as we say in Middle-Earth" (JRR Tolkien)