Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Probability of Article Replacement?

From:Tristan <kesuari@...>
Date:Wednesday, February 26, 2003, 13:10
Joseph Fatula wrote:
> You might be interested to know this: > I often thought that BBC English was quite similar to American English and > that that's why we could understand it. But in talking with some friends > who are here from Mexico (and whose American English comprehension is _very_ > good), they mentioned that they had a _very_ hard time understanding what > Brits were saying. We were watching some movies, and one of them asked me > what we called the particular language they were speaking. They were under > the impression that it was some closely related language like Catalan is to > Castillian (Spanish).
Which is just another part of the debate about where languages end and dialects begin (and if a dialect is just a language with a army/navy, there are a lot more English-derived languages around than I thought :P) And if they had trouble understanding RP (BBC English), I wouldn't send them to Australia any time soon. You sometimes hear the ee-vowel being pronounced with a somewhat fronted [@\] vowel gliding onto an [i]-like vowel. Which is just as well, what with the ear-vowel being a monophthong, making the system something like: i i: u e e: ei @ 8: @u o: oi & &: &i &u O O: a a: ai au bid beard hood bed bared bead bird booed board Boyd had bad paid bowed nod gone bud barred bide load (Perhaps add /u:/ 'fool' and /ou/ 'bowl' to that, depending on if [5]s are pronounced. /&/ is probably not [&]. I don't know where exactly /@u/ fits. The /a/-series looks like it probably wants to move forward. Oh, and [u] doesn't sound anything like some English [8] pronunciations or American [Y](?) ones.) (But from what I've heard of it, Cockney is much scarier. But at any rate, the non-rhotic vowels are different enough from the American ones that rhotic American who had never come across non-rhotic speech would probably have a hard enough time with it.) Tristan.

Replies

John Cowan <jcowan@...>
Joe <joe@...>