Re: OT More pens (was Re: Phoneme winnowing continues)
From: | Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, June 11, 2003, 9:53 |
Joseph Fatula wrote:
>My basic question is this - What makes something a religious piece of
>knowledge versus a non-religious piece of knowledge?
>
>
Ask a person as minimally biased as you can find. They needn't be
religious or atheist or otherwise, but they should not have complained
about the teaching or non-teaching of x as possible, nor should they
have tried convincing another person of their present viewpoint. If they
described x as religious, you've got a fair bet that it is.
I'll say nothing more on this, so please don't start a debate on it. I
think it's just a reasonable starting point and as close to an ending
point as we'll get, even if anyone replied to this.
--
Tristan <kesuari@...>