Re: Tirelat's newly found activeness
From: | Herman Miller <hmiller@...> |
Date: | Saturday, February 12, 2000, 4:25 |
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000 21:57:43 +0100, daniel andreasson
<daniel.andreasson@...> wrote:
>> In any case, both cases in Tirelat are marked.
>
>Really? Why? (Ok, stupid question in the conlang world, but apart from
>that you wanted to... :)
Basically the case marker acts as an article, marking the beginning of a
noun phrase.
>> Everything in Tirelat syntax is either a noun, verb, adjective, adverb, or
>> a grammatical particle that marks the function of words and holds phrases
>> together. So a relative clause, for instance, is formally a prepositional
>> phrase that functions as an adjective.
>
>That's neat. So, do the particles also make prepositional phrases or
>how do you handle those? Do you use a particle that might be seen as
>a preposition that makes up an adverbial phrase?
A preposition is one type of grammatical particle, such as "o" which
basically corresponds to the genitive case, or "mi" which identifies a
source of information (like "according to" in English). Other kinds of
particles include the case markers and conjunctions.
--
languages of Kolagia---> +---<http://www.io.com/~hmiller/languages.html>---
Thryomanes /"If all Printers were determin'd not to print any
(Herman Miller) / thing till they were sure it would offend no body,
moc.oi @ rellimh <-/ there would be very little printed." -Ben Franklin