Re: Conlang Typology Survey
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Friday, May 23, 2003, 13:11 |
En réponse à Tristan McLeay :
>You know, it occurs to me that I don't think I've got two words spelt
>the same pronounced differently...
Hehe, they are necessary for true maggelity ;))) . And it's even nicer when
they have similar meanings or are different forms of the same word ;))) .
> I have words were one extra letter
>changes everything, but not anything like <lufd> [lu] vs <lufd> [lag].
>I'm appalled.
Hehe, I know, I won't stop at anything ;)))) . Of course, I also have words
spelt differently and pronounced the same, with different functions, like
|ragft|: women (unknown number), subject form, |rajm|: the same in object
form, both pronounced ['r\a~N] (and believe it or not, in both cases the
final [N] is a regular pronunciation ;))) ).
So, is that evil enough or do I have to do worse? ;)))
> I'm also supposed to be doing Java and Psych assignments
>:( Why can't they just trust me that I know it all? :)
LOL. Are you trustworthy? ;)))
Christophe Grandsire.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.
Reply