Re: OT: First text in Agsem
From: | Patrick Dunn <tb0pwd1@...> |
Date: | Friday, February 4, 2000, 2:13 |
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Ed Heil wrote:
> It's not just Church Latin, man; it was all over by the late Empire.
> Heck, Julian the Apostate probably spoke that way, or close to it! :)
Probably not. By most accounts he knew just enough Latin to command his
troops. He used to say something to the effect of, "why should I learn
Latin when they only have one good poem and it's just an imitation of
Homer?"
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> .................... edheil@postmark.net .......................
> "In the labyrinth of the alphabet the truth is hidden. It is one
> thing repeated many times." -- AOS
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Patrick Dunn wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Ed Heil wrote:
> >
> > > Patrick Dunn wrote:
> > >
> > > > copjaj infinitaj lacamendajce.
> > >
> > > Is copjaj supposed to derive from "copiae"? If so, note that
> > > Renaissance Latinists would be unlikely to be aware of the
> > > pronunciation of "copiae" as /'copIai/ in Classical Latin. They would
> > > have pronounced it /'copIe/.
> >
> > Well, yeah, I know. That occurred to me. But church Latin gives me hives
> > so I engaged in a bit of artistic license. Perhaps these mages have
> > sources of knowledge that the rest of us didn't.
> >
> > Really, I just can't endure church Latin. I try. But even when I sing
> > out loud to the Carmina Burana, I have to force myself not to sing in
> > classical Latin.
>