Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode

From:Paul Bennett <paul-bennett@...>
Date:Thursday, January 18, 2007, 12:28
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 05:27:00 -0500, Benct Philip Jonsson
<conlang@...> wrote:

> Here be Unicode!
And in this case, I am able to reciprocate.
> Paul Bennett skrev: > > I have a chart of what I think is the latest IPA > > Would you mind showing us that document?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/15/IPA_chart_2005.png
> > I've currently been dealing with them by using the > > COMBINING RETROFLEX HOOK and COMBINING PALATAL HOOK, but > > that's obviously not such a hot prospect for the velar > > lateral fricative. > > > Do you mean: K` = ɬ̢ = \u026c \u0322, K_j = ɬʲ = > \u026c \u02b2 ?
\u0321 instead of \u02b2, thus: ɬ̡
> I've used all of: > * s`_l = ʂˡ = \u0282 \u02e1 > * s\_l = ɕˡ = \u0255 \u02e1 > * z\_l = ʑˡ = \u0291 \u02e1 > * C_l = çˡ = \u00e7 \u02e1 > * x_l = xˡ = \u0078 \u02e1 > which can hardly be misunderstood and is an easily > extendable pattern. I mean, what *would* a laterally > released freicative be if not a lateral fricative?
I have decided to update my manuscript to use this method. Paul

Reply

Benct Philip Jonsson <conlang@...>