Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: CHAT: Importance of stress

From:dirk elzinga <dirk.elzinga@...>
Date:Thursday, January 27, 2000, 19:00
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Matt Pearson wrote:

> Dirk wrote: > > >The preference for syllables to coincide with morpheme > >boundaries seems also to be operative in Amman Iar, but in that > >language, the resolution of the conflict is different. Rather > >than delete consonants which find themselves on the wrong side > >of the morpheme=syllable boundary, Amman Iar instead prefers to > >violate NoCoda; that is, the congruence of syllable and morpheme > >boundaries takes precedence over an unmarked syllable structure. > > > >I think this is rather cool, myself. > > So do I! So Dirk: How can we reconcile all of this with the > tantalising similarities between the Amman Iar stress rule > and the Latin stress rule, as well as the operation of the > Amman Iar gemination rule? > > How about this: Inflected words in Amman Iar are initially > syllabified in accordance with NoCoda and other constraints > which enforce an unmarked syllable structure. Stress > assignment and gemination then operate on the basis of > that representation. Finally, a "syllable-boundary > readjustment" rule (SBRR) is applied, which reassigns > certain onset consonants to coda position, in accordance > with a constraint which enforces congruence between > morpheme and syllable boundaries. A sample derivation > would look like this: > > Take a noun like "adhan" = "man": > > 'a.dhan > > Adding the ergative suffix "-e" triggers a stress shift > to the right, together with resyllabification: > > a.'dha.ne > > Because of a constraint against stressed penultimate > syllables being light, gemination takes place: > > a.'dhan.ne > > Finally, the SBRR is applied, yielding the correct surface > form: > a.'dhann.e > > Something like this might work, yes?
I think so. Of course, in keeping with current fashion in phonology, I would prefer to handle this all by constraints on surface strings rather than derivationally, but in this case I think the end result would be notational variants of the same analysis. Dirk -- Dirk Elzinga dirk.elzinga@m.cc.utah.edu