Re: constructed romance languages

Dale Morris wrote:
> I'm working on a project tenatively called Ierma^nsc (<GERMANICE)
It looks very interesting, but I had a few comments. Hope you don't
mind :) First, I really the name Iermansc, but it seems that the
outcome of Germanice would be *Iermanz. Perhaps Iermansc is derived
instead from *Germaniscu/*Germanescu? Also, you said that c and g
became palatalized before a, but they become /x/ and /G/. I don't
think those would come from palatalization.