Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

From:Carlos Thompson <chlewey@...>
Date:Sunday, May 26, 2002, 3:02
John Cowan wrote:

> BTW, Babm [boabomu] is written in a Latin-derived syllabary
(definitely
> not an abugida, and not, I think, an abjad either, though it would > be possible to make such a case -- that the vowels are not written > in CV syllables because they are overdetermined).
My latest and more serious proposal for an alternate script for Spanish is based on a sylabary for three vowels, with modifiers and a few free consonants: Each of the main symbols represent a CV syllable wher V is either /e/, /a/ or /o/. Modifying symbols would make the vowel high, semivowel or diphthong: C/e/+H = C/i/, C/e/+S = C/j/, C/e/+D = C/je/. C/o/+H = C/u/, C/o/+S = C/w/, C/o/+D = C/we/. The semivowel modifier applied to a C/a/ syllable will make just a C. -n, -s, -r and -l have they own symbols, so they do not use /na/+S. Would this count as a syllabary, an abugida or an abjad? -- Carlos Th

Reply

John Cowan <jcowan@...>