Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary
From: | Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, May 28, 2002, 21:54 |
At 12:52 PM -0400 05/26/02, John Cowan wrote:
>Carlos Thompson scripsit:
>
>> Each of the main symbols represent a CV syllable wher V is either /e/,
>> /a/ or /o/. Modifying symbols would make the vowel high, semivowel or
>> diphthong:
>> C/e/+H = C/i/, C/e/+S = C/j/, C/e/+D = C/je/.
>> C/o/+H = C/u/, C/o/+S = C/w/, C/o/+D = C/we/.
>> The semivowel modifier applied to a C/a/ syllable will make just a C.
>>
>> -n, -s, -r and -l have they own symbols, so they do not use /na/+S.
>>
>> Would this count as a syllabary, an abugida or an abjad?
>
>I call this an abugida, rather in the style of what I suppose should
>now be called "Dirk's abugida". Each consonant series is associated
>with a different vowel type: front, back, or low; there is a *virama*
>(vowel-killer).
Cool. I get a type of writing system named after me.
Dirk
--
Dirk Elzinga Dirk_Elzinga@byu.edu
Man deth swa he byth thonne he mot swa he wile.
'A man does as he is when he can do what he wants.'
- Old English Proverb