Re: Sound changes causing divergence of ordinals from cardinals
From: | Alex Fink <a4pq1injbok_0@...> |
Date: | Thursday, January 5, 2006, 17:24 |
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:19:18 -0600, Nik Taylor <yonjuuni@...> wrote:
>Alex Fink wrote:
>> (2) Primary stress is penultimate (unless there's only one vowel). Vowels
>> under the primary stress shift: non-high vowels rise (/a e 2 Q o/ > /e i y o
>> u/), while high vowels break (/i y u/ > /j@ H@ w@/).
>
>*Stressed* Schwa? Wouldn't that be better as /i@/ /y@/ and /u@/? For
>ease of further changes, I'm adding stress markers as well.
Why not? Take the schwas as /3/s if you really want. /j@ H@ w@/ just
'cause they're rising diphthongs, and since elsewhere we've taken two
adjacent vowel symbols /ao/ as two separate syllable nuclei.
>(3) Intervocalic voiceless stops become fricatives (/x/ further develops
>to /h/ and then 0)
Weird that original /h/ sticks around, then.
I think you missed an inervocalic /k/ in the ordinal of 9:
Value Cardinal Ordinal
1 'j@wQ i'wee
2 'nero na'rue
3 'mj@o mi'ue
4 'tuo to'ue
5 'kin 'kinke
6 'jesu ja'sw@e
7 'Sj@gu Si'gw@e
8 'dZuz2 dZo'zie
9 'hj@ja hi'jee
10 'neo na'ue
11 'hero ha'rue
12 'utsu ot'sw@e
13 nao'mj@o naomi'ue
20 naro'noo naronQ'ue
21 naronQ'H@wQ naronQy'wee
22 naronQo'noro naronQonQ'rue
30 mio'noo mionQ'ue
31 naronQo'horo naronQohQ'rue
32 naronQ'utsu naronQo'tsw@e
33 mikonQo'mj@o mionQomi'ue
Alex