Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
| From: | bnathyuw <bnathyuw@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Thursday, January 16, 2003, 16:58 |
|---|
--- Christophe Grandsire
<christophe.grandsire@...> wrote: > En réponse à
bnathyuw <bnathyuw@...>:
>
> >
> > 1 -a- ( -a, -ae ) |puella|
> > 2 -o- ( -us/-um, -i ) |seruus/templum|
> > 3 -i- or - ( -is/e/C, -is ) |ciuis/animale/urbs|
> > 4 -e- ( -es, -ei ) |res/?spes|
> > 5 -u- ( -us/-u, -us ) |manus/cornu|
> >
> > ( i hope i've got 4 and 5 right ! )
> >
>
> Nope, opposite. But somebody already told you that
> :)) .
exactemonkey
>
> >
> > i always thought it would be sensible to arrange
> them
> > alphabetically : |puella, res, ciuis, seruus,
> manus|,
> > and possibly add a seperate group for consonant
> stems
> > like |urbs|
> >
>
> Why? except for their nominative and the absence of
> the -i- in some cases, they
> use basically the same endings as the "ciuis" type.
> It would be like saying
> that the type "puer" shouldn't belong to the
> "seruus" type because it doesn't
> have the same nominative singular.
>
i was thinking of the gen pl, which alternates |-um|
and |-ium|, generally dividing between the C and i
stems ( again iirr )
bn
=====
bnathyuw | landan | arR
stamp the sunshine out | angelfish
your tears came like anaesthesia | phèdre
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
Reply