Re: [despammed] Re: Sarah's language.
| From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 20:46 |
|---|
En réponse à bnathyuw <bnathyuw@...>:
>
> 1 -a- ( -a, -ae ) |puella|
> 2 -o- ( -us/-um, -i ) |seruus/templum|
> 3 -i- or - ( -is/e/C, -is ) |ciuis/animale/urbs|
> 4 -e- ( -es, -ei ) |res/?spes|
> 5 -u- ( -us/-u, -us ) |manus/cornu|
>
> ( i hope i've got 4 and 5 right ! )
>
Nope, opposite. But somebody already told you that :)) .
>
> i always thought it would be sensible to arrange them
> alphabetically : |puella, res, ciuis, seruus, manus|,
> and possibly add a seperate group for consonant stems
> like |urbs|
>
Why? except for their nominative and the absence of the -i- in some cases, they
use basically the same endings as the "ciuis" type. It would be like saying
that the type "puer" shouldn't belong to the "seruus" type because it doesn't
have the same nominative singular.
Christophe.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.
Replies