Re: OT: Nasalization of French Vowels
From: | Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, December 3, 2003, 22:06 |
En réponse à Muke Tever :
>I've also read somewhere, perhaps on this list or perhaps off, that Dutch
>also keeps nasals from nasalizing preceding vowels.
Only the "long" vowels (i.e. those written with double vowels when there is
a coda consonant) aren't nasalised by a coda nasal. The short ones tend to
be nasalised, although this is purely phonetic (and I hear that clearly
only because I make that distinction phonemically in my L1). For instance,
"boom": tree, is pronounced [bo(:)m], with an unnasalised vowel. However,
"bom": bomb, is pronounced rather like [bO~m], with a nasalised vowel. It's
actually quite a helping feature since in some people's accents the
distinction between short and long vowels (or rather between lax and tense,
since it's a better description of the usual distinction made between those
vowels) is very small, and I sometimes don't hear it. So the nasalisation
of lax vowels helps a bit (I'm really happy that I have a way never to
confuse "boom" and "bom"!! ;))))) ).
Christophe Grandsire.
http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr
You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang.