Re: fortis vs lenis (was Re: German style orthography)
From: | Muke Tever <hotblack@...> |
Date: | Sunday, December 12, 2004, 23:04 |
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 11:20:13 +0000, Ray Brown <ray.brown@...> wrote:
>> I've even heard some people argue
>> that voicing isn't the primary distinction in English (I can't remember
>> what they were arguing was the primary distinction...),
>
> Possibly aspiration - I have seen English described this way.
I've seen it too, but I don't like it.
English does have its unaspirated voiceless stops, after /s/; and to me
it doesn't make sense to lump those with the voiced ones, but rather the
reverse--"disguise" most certainly has a member of /k_h/ phoneme in it,
regardless of what the etymology would indicate.
*Muke!
--
website: http://frath.net/
LiveJournal: http://kohath.livejournal.com/
deviantArt: http://kohath.deviantart.com/
FrathWiki, a conlang and conculture wiki:
http://wiki.frath.net/