Re: mu for [N] (was: Koryak Vowel harmony)
| From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Friday, January 21, 2005, 12:36 |
|---|
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:27:27PM +0200, Isaac Penzev wrote:
> Saludos.
>
> I would not quote all the messages about µ. I just want to emphasize I
> didn't advocate its usage for /N/. I used it EXCLUSIVELY AS A SIMULATION of
> eng caused by limitations of this Listserv and some ppl's mailers. To say
> nothing about CLP#41 written in Cyrillics...
Since when have intentions counted for anything? Conlangs around the
globe will now use |µ| for /N/, and we can all look back and blame you.
:)
Personally, I must say that even in environments where I have access to
the full Unicode range, I don't like to use eng in a Latin transcription
system; I find it aesthetically unappealing.
-Marcos
Reply